
WestEnder
November 5, 2009
The apparent success of the ongoing Burrard Bridge lane re-allocation trial is something urban planner Gordon Price would like to think foretells a new “post-motordom” era, in which urban roadways evolve to accommodate not only cars but a variety of transportation methods. “As we move into the post-motordom era, the car will be accommodated as one of the five modes of transportation that we use — in addition to feet, bikes, taxis, [and] transit — but it won’t be the dominant one,” Price, the director of SFU’s City Program, told WE. “I think what’s going to happen — and you can see it already in most places in Europe — is the streets will become places of common use for different users.”
Price was a supporter of the first Burrard Bridge lane re-allocation trial, in 1996, when he was nearing the end of his six-term stretch as an NPA city councillor. That trial, which lasted six days, was unsuccessful, Price says, because not enough effort was made to inform the public about it beforehand. “It just came as a real shock to people,” he recalls.
This year, however, a rigorous promotional campaign by City staff helped citizens prepare for the change, which, beginning on July 13, saw a southbound vehicle lane re-allocated for bikes, the northbound sidewalk become a bikes-only lane, and the west sidewalk rededicated for the exclusive use of pedestrians.
“It is important to note, historically, that there was never an option to keep the status quo,” Price says, adding that the legal necessity of making the Burrard Bridge safer for cyclists has already resulted in a court case. “Have things changed [between now and 1996]? Yeah, clearly they have, in two respects: more people are cycling, [and] more people realize the need for more sustainable transportation, so I think there’s more desire to make something like this work.”
Assistant city engineer Jerry Dobrovolny presented a Fall 2009 status report on the lane trial at Vancouver City Council’s Transportation and Traffic meeting Tuesday (Nov. 3), outlining the progress of the trial as well as disclosing the results of a September 2009 Mustel Group public-opinion survey on the subject.
The survey, which consisted of 300 random telephone interviews with Vancouver residents in the months leading up to and following the launch of the trial, indicates largely positive support, with 45 per cent responding in favour of retaining the re-allocated lanes after the Olympics, and 21 per cent opposed. Support for the trial, including from drivers of single-occupancy vehicles, outweighs opposition three to one in what the survey refers to as “target neighbourhoods,” or downtown and west-side neighbourhoods near the Burrard Bridge. Cyclists, in particular, responded positively to the trial, with 90 per cent favouring retention of the re-allocation after the Olympics. Seventy-one per cent of pedestrians surveyed favoured keeping the re-allocation.
Opinions expressed in the Mustel survey echoed Dobrovolny’s recommendation on behalf of City staff that the bike lanes stay in place. Staff will return with a post-Olympics proposal for permanent plans for the bridge. (The previously mooted idea of widening the sidewalks is reportedly no longer a consideration.)
The City status report mentions lingering concerns about pedestrians being restricted to the west sidewalk only, as well as increased travel times for vehicle trips on Pacific and Thurlow streets.
Members of the Vancouver Area Cycling Coalition (VACC) spoke at council Tuesday to call for a permanent two-lane re-allocation, as well as improved bike lanes approaching the bridge on either side. “We are concerned about the pedestrians having to use only the west side, and it would be so great if the pedestrians could re-claim their east sidewalk,” VACC president Arno Schortinghuis told WE before the meeting. “The other point is that the east sidewalk is a bit narrow for cycling... I think for a permanent solution, we would love the northbound lane re-allocated for cycling as well.”
Schortinghuis, who cycled across the bridge during the 1996 re-allocation trial, is glad to see more than 10 years of VACC advocacy work coming to fruition with the current lane trial. “It was such a thrill, even back then, to go over the bridge in a re-allocated traffic lane,” he says, “and it’s really great to be able to do that again.”
PHOTO: Following a well-received trial period, Vancouver City Council will now decide whether to make the re-allocated bike and pedestrian lanes on the Burrard Bridge permanent. By Doug Shanks.





